Religious Research

Religious Research

Feasibility of Mystical Role-Modeling in the Modern Sphere; (An Analysis of its Connections to the Foundations of Charles Taylor's Project of the Ethics of Authenticity) Examining the Feasibility of Mystical Role-Modeling in the Present Modern Modernity Age

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors
1 Associate Professor, Department of Philosophy of Religion, Religions, and Mysticism, Faculty of Theology, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2 MA Student, Religions and Mysticism, Faculty of Theology, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/jrr.2025.508167.2264
Abstract
A prominent characteristic of humans in the present era — often simultaneously termed the age of modernity and post-modernity — is their pursuit of experiential knowledge. They must first experience something through their senses before converting it into belief. On the other hand, attaining mystical experience and knowledge is not achievable at the beginning of a mystic's spiritual path; rather, it is a posterior matter, requiring the passage of time and trust in the instructions of the path's master. The main question of this research is whether contemporary humans, with such characteristics, can enter the realm of mysticism? And if so, how can the qualification of such a master be proven to them? Our key finding in this study is that contemporary humans can indeed enter the realm of mysticism, and the qualification of the master and his teachings are not necessarily posterior matters; rather, through minor prior experiences, his qualification can be ascertained, thus completing the proof for the disciple to follow him. The research method of this study is case-based, whereby the behavior a disciple must adopt on their path is observed in light of the characteristics of a contemporary human, and a solution for their entry into the mystical path has been found, concluding that such an endeavor is feasible. In this research, Taylor's project of the Ethics of Authenticity is utilized as a postmodern methodological framework, and role-modeling is proposed as an intermediary, experience-based solution between traditional and postmodern perspectives. Mystics consider the perception of mystical knowledge dependent upon traversing the spiritual path and highly emphasize the importance of having a guide or master (Pīr) for this purpose; they believe that the discovery and perception of such knowledge is entirely concomitant with the presence of such a guide. From their perspective, the disciple (Morīd) must submit and devote themselves to such a master to complete their upbringing. Conversely, contemporary, so-called modern humans are experiential; they do not believe in something until they have experienced it. Since acquiring transcendent knowledge through following a master requires the passage of time, and the disciple cannot experience the knowledge they will ultimately acquire from the outset, this lack of prior experiential understanding is unacceptable to modern humans. This may lead them to refuse role-modeling and accepting the practices suggested by the spiritual master. For modern humans, emulating a model in any way possible is not acceptable. If they are to tread the spiritual path, the master's qualification must be proven to them in some way. In this study, humans living in the world of modernity and post-modernity encounter one of the prerequisites for entering the realm of mysticism —f ollowing a guide (Pīr) — and reasons for this following have been found within both modern and postmodern domains. This can open a window for contemporary humans to enter the realm of mysticism and its transcendent knowledge. The method of this research is analytical and epistemological. The data collection method was library research, using note-taking as the tool.

The research method of this research was a case study, In this research, Taylor's originality ethics project was used as a postmodern method, and through it, role modeling was proposed as an intermediate and experimental solution between traditional and postmodern perspectives.
Keywords
Subjects

A) Persian and Arabic Sources:
Abdolkarimi, Bijan; Dabbbagh, Soroush. 1400. Munāẓirah bā ʿUnvān-i Imkān-i Zīst-i Maʿnavī dar Rūzgār-i Kunūnī [Debate titled 'The Possibility of Spiritual Life in the Present Time']. 14 Mordad 1400. Retrieved from: https://t.me/s/bijanabdolkarimi?before=5982
Ahadian, Parisa. 1395 Sh.. " Gozāresh-e Shab-e Masnavī va Qur'ān-e Majīd: Ma'nī-ye Qur'ān ze Qur'ān purs o bas [Report on the Evening of Masnavi and the Holy Qur'an: Ask the Meaning of the Qur'an from the Qur'an Itself]." Bokhara Bimonthly [Dūmahānnama-ye Bukhārā], No. 115, pp. 62-63.
Appignanesi, Richard; Garratt, Chris. 1397 Sh.  Postmūdernism (Qadam-i Awwal) [Postmodernism (the Frist Step)]. Translated by Fatemeh Jalali Sa'adat [Original title: Introducing Postmodernism]. Tehran: Shirazeh-ye Ketab-e Ma.
Bābā Ṭāhir. 1380 Sh. Dūbaytī-hā-ye Bābā Ṭāhir [The Quatrains of Baba Taher]. Edited by Nesa Hamzezadeh. Tehran: Talayeh.
Cahoone, Lawrence. 1401 Sh. Az Mudernism tā Postmudernism [From Modernism to Postmodernism]. Translated by Abdolkarim Rashidian. Tehran: Nashr-e Ney.
Dabbagh, Soroush. (1394). Falsafah-ye Lājvardī-ye Sipihrī  [The Azure Philosophy of Sepehri]. Tehran: Serat Publications.
Ḥāfiẓ, Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad. 1379. Dīvān-e Ḥāfiẓ. Tehran: Nashr-e Dowran.
Ḥusaynī Tehrānī, Sayyid Muḥammad Ḥusayn. (1384). Rūḥ-e Mojarrad [The Immaterial Spirit]. Mashhad: Allāmah Ṭabāṭabā'ī.
Ibn al-ʿArabī, Muḥyī al-Dīn. 1370 Sh. Fuṣūṣ al-Ḥikam [The Bezels of Wisdom]. With commentary by Abu 'l-ʿAlā al-ʿAfīfī. Beirut: Dar al-Kitāb al-ʿArabī.
Lashkarbolouki, Mojtaba; Shamekhi, Vahid. 1397. Zehn-e Ziba [The Beautiful Mind]. Tehran: Rasa.
Malekian, Mostafa. 1395. Sukhanrānī bā ʿUnvān-i Mawlānā va Insān-i Rūzgār-i Mā [Speech titled 'Mowlavi and the Human of Our Time']. Isfahan University of Technology. Retrieved from: https://t.me/sokhanranihaa/51215
Mehrabi Kali, Misaq. 1403 Sh. *Barrasī-ye Imkān-e Taḥqīq-e Ulgūgarā'ī-ye 'Irfānī dar 'Aṣr-e Mudernitah, Muṭāla'ah-ye Mawridī: Pīr va Murād* [Investigating the Feasibility of Mystical Role-Modeling in the Age of Modernity, Case Study: The Spiritual Master and Disciple]. Master's Thesis, Faculty of Theology, Farabi Campus, University of Tehran.
Motahhari, Morteza. 1402 Sh. ʿIlal-e Girāyish bi Māddīgarī [Causes of the Inclination Towards Materialism]. Tehran: Sadra.
Mousavi Taqi-abadi, Negarsadat; Kazemi, Mostafa; Malekzadeh, Gholamreza. 1401 Sh. " Ṭarrāḥī-ye Modelī az ʿAwāmil-i Mu'aththir bar ʿAmalkard-i Murshidiyat va Āzmūn-i Ān dar Ṣanʿat-i Barq" [Designing a Model of Factors Affecting Mentorship Performance and Testing it in the Electricity Industry]. Nashriya-ye Rahyārī dar Mudīriyat va Tawse'a-ye Bahri'varī [Coaching in Management and Productivity Development Journal], No. 1, 1-16.
Mowlavi, Jalaluddin Muhammad ibn Muhammad. 1377. Masnavi-ye Ma'navi [The Spiritual Masnavi]. Edited by Abdolkarim Soroush. Tehran: Scientific and Cultural Publications Company.
Naraqi, Ahmad. 1370. "Bāznigarī-ye Rābiṭa-ye Murīd-Murādī dar 'Irfān" [Re-examining the Master-Disciple Relationship in Mysticism]. Kiyan Journal, No. 2, 18-26.
Qarabāghī, ʿAlī Aṣghar. 1387. "Tabārishināsī-e Postmudernism: Shinākht-e Uṣūl va Mafāhīm-e Postmudernism (1) [Identification of postmodernism lineage: understanding the principles and concepts of Poestmodernism]." Nashrīyah-ye Gulistāneh, No. 7, 42–56.
Shams al-Shomus Institute, Editorial Board. 1400. ʿAṭash [Thirst]. Tehran: Shams al-Shomus Cultural and Research Institute.
Shaykh Ṣadūq, Muḥammad ibn 'Alī. 1385. Ilal al-Sharā'iʿ [The Causes of Laws]. Qom: Davari Bookstore.
Taylor, Charles. 1402 Sh. Akhlāq-i Aṣālat [The Ethics of Authenticity]. Translated by Vaḥīd Suhrābī Far. Qom: Intishārāt-i Dānishgāh-i Adyān va Madhāhib [University of Religions and Denominations Publications].
 
B. English Sources:
Lyotard, J.-F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, C. 1992. The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.