پژوهش های ادیانی

پژوهش های ادیانی

مسیحیت در جامعه پساسکولار بازتعریف دوگانه دینی- غیردینی در دوران معاصر

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
حمید طالب 1
ابوالقاسم فنائی 2
مهدی لک زایی 3
باقر طالبی دارابی 4
1 دانشجوی دکتری دین‌پژوهی، دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب، قم، ایران
2 استادیار گروه فلسفه، دانشگاه مفید، قم، ایران
3 استادیار گروه ادیان غیرابراهیمی، دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب، قم، ایران
4 استادیار گروه ادیان ابراهیمی، دانشگاه ادیان و مذاهب، قم، ایران
چکیده
مجموعه اوضاع و احوال خاص اجتماعیِ فرهنگ غرب در دوران مدرن، گسست میان امر دینی و امر غیردینی را عمیق‌تر کرد و تعریف جدیدی از دین پیش کشید. نظریه‌پردازان غربی در واکنش به این اوضاع و احوال اجتماعی، به طور خاص مسیحیت را در برابر امر غیردینی، دین تصویر کردند و این روندِ خاص جدایی را سکولاریزاسیون نامیدند. اما در نتیجه دگرگونی‌های اجتماعی عصر حاضر، نظریه‌های پساسکولار کوشیده‌اند با گذر از ایده‌های سکولار، امر دینی و امر غیردینی را پیوند دهند. این مقاله برای بررسی روند چنین تحولاتی با استفاده از نظریه‌های مختلف، تحول آگاهی و معرفت دینی در جامعه را شرح می‌دهد. در نهایت و پس از تحلیل انتقادی تحولات مذکور، به منظور برقراری پیوند دین و غیردین در عصر حاضر، تجدیدنظر در عقلانیت به عنوان راه‌حل پیشنهاد شده است.
کلیدواژه‌ها
دین در عصر حاضر
سکولاریسم
پساسکولاریسم
‌ حوزه عمومی
فرهنگ غرب

عنوان مقاله English

Christianity in the Post-Secular Society Redefinition of the Duality of Religious/ Non-religious in the Contemporary Times

نویسندگان English

Hamid Taleb 1
َAbulghasem Fanaei 2
Mahdi Lakzaei 3
Bagher Talebi Darabi 4
1 PhD Student in Theology, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran
2 Assistant Professor Department of Philosophy, Mufīd University, Qom, Iran
3 Assistant Professor Department of Non-Abrahamic Religions, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran
4 Assistant Professor Department of Abrahamic Religions, University of Religions and Denominations, Qom, Iran
چکیده English

The set of special social situations of Western culture in the modern times deepened the gap between the religious and non-religious affairs and introduced a new definition of religion. In response to these social situations, Western theorists, as opposed to secularism, specifically portrayed Christianity as a religion, calling this particular process of separation secularization. But as a result of the social transformations of the present age, post-secular theories have sought to link the religious and non-religious affairs by transcending secular ideas. To examine the process of such developments, this article describes the evolution of religious awareness and knowledge using various theories.
Finally, after a critical analysis of these developments, in order to establish a link between religion and non-religion in the present age, a revision of rationality has been proposed as a solution.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

: Religion in the Present Age
Secularism
Post-Secularism
Public Sphere
Western Culture
Asad, Talal. 1993. Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Asad, Talal. 2003. Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Asad, Talal. 2011 a. “Thinking about the Secular Body, Pain and Liberal Politics”. In: Cultural Anthropology, 26 (4), pp.657–675.
Asad, Talal. 2011 b. “The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam”. In: Qui Parle, vol. 17, no. 2.
Berger, Peter L. 2014. The Many Altars of Modernity: Toward A Paradigm for Religion in a Pluralist Age, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Borradori, Giovanna. 2003. Philosophy in a Time of Terror: Dialogues with Jürgen Habermas and Jacques Derrida, Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Braidotti, Rosi & et al. (ed.). 2014. Transformations of Religion and the Public Sphere: Postsecular Publics, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Calhoun, Craig; Juergensmeyer, Mark; Van Antwerpen, Jonathan. 2011. Rethinking Secularism, New York: Oxford University Press.
Casanova, José. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Casanova, José. 2006. “Rethinking Secularization: a Global Comparative Perspective”. In: After Secularization, The Hedgehog Review, 8 (1/2), pp.7-22.
Casanova, José. 2011. “The Secular, Secularizations, and Secularism”. In: Craig Calhoun, Mark Juergensmeyer, and Jonathan Van Antwerpen. In: Rethinking 
Secularism, New York: Oxford University Press.
Casanova, José. 2012. “Are We Still Secular? Explorations on the Secular and the Post-Secular”. In: Nynäs, Peter, Mika Lassander, and Terhi Utriainen, Post-Secular Society, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
Du Toit, Cornel W. 2006. “Secular Spirituality versus Secular Dualism: Towards Postsecular Holism as Model for a Natural Theology”. In: HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies, 62 (4), pp.1251-1268.
Falk, Richard. 1988. “Religion and Politics: Verging on the Postmodern”. In: Alternatives XIII, pp.379–94.
Fitzgerald, Thimothy. 2000. The Ideology of Religious Studies, New York: Oxford University Press.
Fitzgerald, Thimothy. 2007. Discourse on Civility and Barbarity: A Critical History of Religion and Related Categories, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fitzgerald, Thimothy. 2008. “Rethinking Secularism: Religion is not a Standalone Category”. In: http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/2008/10/29/religion-is-not-a-standalone-category/
Fox, Jonathan. 2012. An Introduction to Religion and Politics: Theory and Practice, New York: Routledge.
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. “Religion as a Cultural System”. In: the Interpretation of Cultures, New York: Basic Books.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989 a. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989 b. The Theory of Communicative Action. Lifeworld and System: a Critique of Functionalist Reason, Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1999. “From Kant to Hegel and Back Again – The Move towards Detranscendentalization”. In: European Journal of Philosophy, 7 (2), pp.129–157.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2003. The Future of Human Nature, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. “Religion in the Public Sphere”. In: European Journal of Philosophy, 14, pp.1–25.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2008. Between Naturalism and Religion: Philosophical Essays, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 2010. “A Postsecular World Society? On the Philosophical Significance of Postsecular Consciousness and the Multicultural World Society”. In: The Immanent Frame, February3, 2010, http://blogs.ssrc.org/tif/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/A-Postsecular-World-Society-TIF.pdf.
Habermas, Jürgen; Ratzinger, Joseph. 2006. The Dialectics of Secularism: On Reason and Religion, USA: Ignatius Press.
Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman. 2004. “The Political Authority of Secularism in International Relations”. In: European Journal of International Relations, 10 (2), pp.235–262.
Hurd, Elizabeth Shakman. 2008. The Politics of Secularism in International Relations, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Juergensmeyer, Mark. 2003. Terror in the Mind of God: The Global Rise of Religious Violence, Berkeley and London: University of California Press.
Nandy, Ashis. 1998. “The Politics of Secularism and the Recovery of Religious Tolerance”. In: Rajeev Bhargava (Ed.) Secularism and Its Critics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thomas, Scott M. 2005. The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations: The Struggle for the Soul of the Twenty-First Century, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.